Indicators on case law on bail on new facts You Should Know
Indicators on case law on bail on new facts You Should Know
Blog Article
Should the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC might dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced a possibility to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is frequently only done In the event the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Within the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence as well as the petitioner company responded to the allegations therefore they were nicely aware of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use to be seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
For legal professionals, there are specific rules regarding case citation, which differ depending around the court and jurisdiction hearing the case. Proper case regulation citation in a state court may not be acceptable, or simply accepted, in the U.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is often a free and democratic state, and once a person becomes a major she or he can marry whosoever he/she likes; In case the parents of your boy or Female never approve of this sort of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they might do if they could cut off social relations with the son or the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this kind of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or male that's a major, the couple is neither harassed by anybody nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives these kinds of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to process by instituting criminal proceedings with the police against these persons and further stern action is taken against these types of person(s) as provided by law.
This ruling has conditions, and For the reason that petitioners failed a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based within the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 of the Constitution. Read more
This is because transfer orders are typically regarded within the administrative discretion in the employer. However, there can be exceptions in cases where the transfer is motivated by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, they may have grounds to challenge before the right forum. Read more
Generally speaking, higher courts tend not to have direct oversight over the lower courts of record, in that they cannot reach out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments of the lessen courts.
When the state court hearing the case reviews the regulation, he finds that, while it mentions large multi-tenant properties in certain context, it is actually actually quite vague about whether the ninety-working day provision relates to all landlords. The judge, based to the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held into the ninety-working day notice prerequisite, and rules in Stacy’s favor.
We're an independent branch of government constitutionally entrusted with the fair and just resolution of disputes in order to preserve the rule of regulation and also to protect the rights and liberties guaranteed through the Constitution and laws with the United States and this State.
In certain jurisdictions, case regulation is usually applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family legislation.
Article 199 in the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other adequate remedy is provided by legislation." It's properly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust accessible remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless check here of whether People remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is effectively-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within 90 days. When the appeal is just not decided within that timeframe, he/she will then solution the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, because the 90 days with the department to act has already expired. Within the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided with the decision of your Supreme Court in the case of Dr.
The reason for this difference is that these civil legislation jurisdictions adhere into a tradition that the reader should manage to deduce the logic from the decision and also the statutes.[four]
156 . Const. P. 1015/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Saleem Jehangir V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally it is important to note that neither seniority nor promotion could be the vested right of the civil servant, therefore, neither any seniority nor any promotion may be claimed or granted without the actual size of service on account of vested rights. The purpose of prescribing a particular length of service for becoming entitled to generally be regarded for promotion to a higher quality, of course, will not be without logic as being the officer who's at first inducted to the particular post needs to provide within the said post to gain experience to hold the next higher post also to provide the public in a very befitting method.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, It is usually a effectively-founded proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is topic to your procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings over the evidence.